Indian Left's hubris

Sent to the Letters to the Editor, Deccan Herald on June 27.

Sir,
The Editorial, Clear the Air (June 27, 2008), rightly addresses the Central Government to decide the issue of signing the 123 Agreement sooner than later. But the issue is sure to simmer at least till the next general elections because of the Left parties’ inflexible opposition. They have threatened to withdraw support and precipitate early elections. They are canvassing among the parties inside and outside the UPA to block the government from winning a contingent vote of confidence, and have announced their decision to vote on the BJP side if needed. Do such extreme threats and frenetic activities bode well for the Left parties themselves? Do they believe that the signing of the agreement is a now or never event, which can be blocked permanently if they can block it now?

The fact is that the Left cannot block the agreement now or ever if the government decides to sign it and face the consequences, including the Left’s vindictiveness, as they come. The Left leaders themselves would be knowing that their larger-than-life role and bargaining power in the present dispensation are products exclusively of the 2004 elections, which may not be available after the next general elections. They would also be knowing that the BJP is currently trivializing the agreement only to appropriate it when it comes to power next. It is quite possible that India will sign the agreement if the NDA, or a UPA with no need for Left’s support, gets power next, and the US keeps the offer alive. What will the Left’s present objections come to then? Perhaps, to a big loss of face and credibility. Reality being such, a pragmatic option for the Left would be to take a long term shot at the issue and save some political grace for themselves.
P.P.Sudhakaran
Bangalore.