A Letter to the Editor
NOTA and compulsory voting
Sir,
In seeking to
relate NOTA to compulsory voting as a “meaningful” requirement, Mr. Advani’s
blog has completely missed its meaning. By allowing the right to reject, the
Supreme Court has actually enlarged the choice of the voter. Mr. Advani wants
to restrict it, ignoring the fact that democracy is all about voluntariness in
political choices. Right to vote is an inalienable right vested in the voter,
which includes also the right not to vote. Making it mandatory would give the
establishment an opportunity to coerce the voters and punish the defaulters.
That Mr. Advani has endorsed Mr. Modi’s idea is not surprising, for, both are
products of an organization that upholds discipline, regimentation and
uniformity in matter even of culture as virtues. There could be one more
reason. The inspiration for launching the BJP in 1980 was the hope that the
Hindus, being the majority community, would put the Party in power in
perpetuity. Mr. Advani, perhaps, hopes now that at least when driven into the
polling booths, a sufficiently large number of Hindus might always choose the
‘Hindutva’ party.
No comments:
Post a Comment